An Unfinished
Revolution:
The Life and Legacy of Rabbi David Hartman
Parashat Terumah
February 15, 2013
The Life and Legacy of Rabbi David Hartman
Parashat Terumah
February 15, 2013
Early July, 2010, was the first day
that I set foot in an institution I would quickly come to think of as a second
home. It was a busy day at the Shalom
Hartman Institute in Jerusalem; everywhere I looked people were engaged in
animated discussions, and there was a sea of green and grey and blue uniforms –
it seemed as if the Institute had been invaded by the Israel Defense
Forces. I quickly learned that all
officers in Israel who reach a certain rank are now required to take a two-week
long seminar on Jewish identity as part of their training – and that two days
of that seminar, dealing with pluralism and democracy… take place at and is run
by the Shalom Hartman Institute.
My friends, the Jewish world lost a
giant this past week, a monumental figure whose importance to contemporary
Jewish life, whose impact in Israel and in North America and in the entire
Jewish world was enormous, but whose legacy might be hard to convey to those
not familiar with his work. Rabbi David
Hartman, founder of the Institute named after his father, passed away in
Jerusalem last Sunday. He was 81.
I am not among the students and
disciples who had known Reb Dovid for many years. I heard him in person only over the past few
years. I will try to share with you
something of his story, but listen first, if you will, to the testimony of
others. Rabbi Rick Jacobs, now President
of the Union for Reform Judaism, writes that “I would not be a rabbi if I had not
studied with Rabbi David Hartman.” One
Conservative colleague I sit with said that reading Rabbi Hartman’s book Joy and Responsibility changed his life
forever, and another Conservative rabbi indicated that the book A Living
Covenant transformed [his] thinking about God, revelation and the meaning
of Israel in Jewish religious consciousness.”
An Orthodox rabbi writes that “he saved Orthodoxy from itself,” a
philosophy professor calls him “one of the greatest Jewish thinkers of the 20th
century,” and secular Israelis speak of how he opened a window, and then a
door, into the traditional world for them.
And I… he was suffering in these past few years, and not in his prime,
but still he often took my breath away.
And when I read The God Who Hates
Lies, there were times when I put the book down and cried.
Who is this man, this enigmatic
revolutionary thinker and builder, who had such an impact on those who knew
him?
The simple story begins this way:
Rabbi David Hartman was born on September 11, 1931 into an ultra-Orthodox
family, in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn.
He was immersed in the yeshiva world – he studied in Lakewood and at a Chabad-Lubavitch yeshiva. [For those of you not familiar with the
universe of ultra-Orthodox Judaism, this is an amazing statement – it means
that he was fully immersed in both the Litvish, or Lithuanian, and
the Chasidic branches of Charedi Judaism.
We may think of the ultra-Orthodox as a monolithic bloc but it is hardly
that, and these are the opposite ends of that world.] He went on to Yeshiva University, receiving
rabbinic ordination from, Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik, known as the Rav, perhaps
the single most important Orthodox rabbi of the past century. He then became perhaps the preeminent
disciple of the Rav. Soloveitchik urged his student to delve into secular
studies as well, and it was while studying philosophy at Fordham and later
McGill, and through encountering the spiritual journeys of those with very
different backgrounds, that David Hartman’s world really opened up. “I was,” he writes with characteristic
honesty, “often struck by an awareness that my Catholic philosophy instructors
were inspiring far more religious connection and consciousness than my rabbis
at Yeshiva.”
In many ways I might say that what
happened to David Hartman is that the reality and the real lives of those
around him entered into his theoretical and theological consciousness, and he
was willing to call a spade a spade. He
led congregations in the Bronx and then Montreal. The stories he tells of his congregational
work are deeply moving, especially his openness to the times when moral choices
come into head on conflicts with religious tradition – I think he may actually
have performed the marriage of a lonely, life-long bachelor who finally met the
woman of his dreams, but he was a Cohen and she was a convert, and they could
not marry according to Orthodox tradition.
This is what he wrote about it, in The
God Who Hates Lies: “The notion of telling these two very serious Jewish seekers
that they must deny themselves the happiness of marriage because of this
now-obscure, ancient principle seemed unacceptable as the ground for destroying
their dream to build a new life. I told
Peter that I would be honored to perform the wedding.”
This is an Orthodox rabbi? Yes, actually – but what an Orthodox rabbi he
was! He lived by and struggled with
halacha – Jewish law, but developed the very-Reform sounding idea that Jewish
tradition must be evaluated and embraced or challenged through the crucible of,
well, the moral judgment of each individual Jew. Or at least that’s what I heard him say in
his last major book.
But, again, what was the power, what
the charisma, that led people to use such reverent phrases about him as saying
that they were privileged to “sit at his feet.”
Or to refer to learning with him as “Hartman Torah.” Those are strong words; this is a loyalty
that goes beyond being grateful that someone was a really good teacher. This is language of reverence, the utterance
of disciples. Why?
It is because as modern as he was in
his outlook, David Hartman was a rav in the old sense – he challenged, he
probed, he poked, he stirred up the status quo… and he did so with love, love,
love. [He once told North American Jews
that when they are critical of Israel, which was legitimate, we should speak
the criticism as a mother, and not that of a mother-in-law!] He saw the whole person, not just the tools
or techniques of tradition. He was, in
other words, not just a passive teacher, but an active guide. Another scholar, eulogizing him this week,
recalled how his life, too, had been changed by one encounter: after delivering
what he thought was an erudite and adequately footnote-filled sermon in some
synagogue lecture hall somewhere, David Hartman punctured his pride and
deepened his life with one question: “Did you say what you meant, and mean what
you said – or did you just want to sound good?”
Scholarship with meaning, depth and
honesty, vision and values – this is what the Shalom Hartman Institute is
about, to me. Rabbi Hartman made aliyah
with his family in 1971, following the intuition that the reality of Israel
brings something new to Jewish life, a response to history that entails a new level
of responsibility to our people on the part of every Jew. (There is so much more to say about David
Hartman’s vision of Zionism, his understanding of Israel and its relationship
to Jewish values, but that is worth an entirely separate discussion – or an
entire semester onto itself.) In 1975 he
founded the institution named after his father around a Beit Midrash, a study
hall that was the source of conversation and exploration, for academics and
intellectuals and open-minded rabbis of all stripes.
The pluralism of the place evolved
organically out of Hartman’s thought. If
we are truly in a living covenant with God, Hartman taught, than that covenant
has two partners, both of whose realities must be taken into account. Avi Sagi writes: “In contrast with Yehsayahu
Leibowitz [perhaps the leading religious thinker in Israel in the previous
generation], who reasoned that the believer must sacrifice his principles in
the name of ‘love God and fear Him,’ Hartman comes to the opposite
conclusion.” [Let’s amplify this point
for a moment. As an oversimplification,
Leibowitz would oppose, for example, any effort to make services more
interesting, or more fulfilling on a personal level. Personal fulfillment was utterly beside the
point. If a commandment comes from
a Commander, and the Commander is outside of us, then how we feel about
following orders is irrelevant. In fact, the more we like what we are told to
do, the less it is obedience, and the more it is done for our own interests and
motivations. We follow, because we are
told to – not based on who we are or how we feel.] Hartman, as I said, came to exactly the
opposite position. Sagi continues: "Since the covenant is
with a real being, it validates the existence and the principles of the real
human being. If follows from this that
the covenant is a meeting between the past and the present and the present that
renews the past. This understanding
underpins the development of a pluralistic worldview, founded upon respect for
the believes and the principles of human beings. The covenant with God is, in a deep sense, a
covenant that validates difference and diversity.”
And
it is the embrace of diversity, the preaching of pluralism, that landed Hartman
in such hot water in Israel, and in the eyes of the ultra-Orthodox. To have built an institution that lifts up
the learning, and defends the dignity, of all branches of Judaism and those who
are on no branch but just searching for roots… what a chiddush! What a radical
innovation!
Friends,
remember: there is really nothing else remotely like this! Where all branches of Judaism come together
in this country – uneasily and unevenly – it is often on matters of public
policy or social concern. It is not for
learning, exploration, chevruta (partnership learning), and vulnerability. It is for agendas, not growth.
The
machon, the institute that David Hartman founded and which is carried forward
by his son Rabbi Donniel Hartman, it is having an awesome impact in Israel and
in North America. It has transformed the
teaching of rabbis and the language of lay leaders here, in the promotion of
inspiration and aspiration, a visionary Judaism and a values-based approach to
Israel… and in Israel as well, in terms of how Judaism is taught to secular
Israelis, and how Israeli society balances the question of being a Jewish and
democratic state.
But. For all the impact it is having, David
Hartman’s vision is, for now, an unfinished revolution. Ein
navi b’iro; there is, it is said, no prophet in one’s own city. It remains the case, for now, that David’s
writings are studied more in English than in Hebrew. One of the more powerful voices among the
young students of Rabbi Hartman, Micha Goodman, notes that Hartman probably
fits into the category, along with Mordecai Kaplan and Abraham Joshua Heschel,
as an American voice of Judaism, better known in America than in Israel – just
as the great Israeli teachers of Judaism, Rav Kook the Elder, Rav Kook the
Younger, and the aforementioned Yeshayahu Leibowitz, are better known in
Hebrew, and in Israel, than they are in the English-speaking Jewish world.
Maybe.
Maybe. But I believe there is
room for the building of bridges in every place. For a nuanced Judaism, one open to the world
and steeped in traditional learning, a place that puts people first… I believe the message will continue to
spread, here… and there.
We read in the Torah portion this
week: “v’asu li mikdash, v’shachanti
b’tocham; let them make me a Sanctuary, that I might dwell among
them.” The words may have referred,
originally, to a place of prayer. But to
me, the place where I have felt God dwell among us the most… I think it is in
the House that David Built. In the Beit
Midrash, the Study Hall of the Shalom Hartman Institute, where the honesty of
scholars who speak from the heart, and the warmth of friends who wrestle with
ancient words in partnership with each other…
that was my reminder, in mid-life… of what Judaism is, and maybe once
was, and can be again.
We lost a giant this week. My only hope is that my words reach some of
your hearts, and you hear them as an inspiration… to take in some of the
teachings of this great man. To study,
to learn, to be open, and to grow.
Shabbat Shalom.
No comments:
Post a Comment